MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Unloading the Fair Credit Program

Compliance expert examines the Fair Credit Program and its influence on dealers.

April 14, 2022
Unloading the Fair Credit Program

Compliance expert examines the Fair Credit Program and its influence on dealers.

Credit:

IMAGE: Pixabay

4 min to read



The genesis of a Fair Credit Program occurred when the Obama administration’s Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued guidance to the finance sources it has oversight of. This guidance required the finance sources who service the auto industry to monitor their portfolios to ensure there wasn’t any negative disparate impact against protected classes. 

Shortly after the CFPB guidance, the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) published its Fair Credit Compliance Policy and Program. 

The NADA Fair Credit Compliance Program recommends establishing a Standard Dealer Participation Rate (the standard rate or a rate matrix with a pre-set dealer participation markup, usually 200 or 250 basis points over the buy rate) and to document any downward movement from the standard mark up. Some dealers adapted the NADA program. Those that didn’t generally felt adapting the program did not provide safe harbor protection or they didn’t feel the additional paperwork was worth the effort.

Nissan Motor Acceptance and Infiniti Financial Services (jointly NMAC) recently set the bar for finance sources who service the automotive sector regarding a Fair Credit policy. It became the initial finance source who requires its dealers to choose between a flat rate dealer reserve program or a dealer reserve program capped at two points based on a condition of documented Fair Credit compliance. These reserve programs apply to retail deals financed with NMAC. 

If the dealer chooses the flat rate program it must contract every retail deal at the buy rate and is paid a flat dealer reserve. Adapting the flat rate program limits any further compliance documentation as every financed deal will be contracted at a rate set by NMAC. 

NMAC selected the NADA Fair Credit Compliance Policy and Program guidelines for a dealer to document compliance if the dealer selects the second option which gives the dealership the flexibility to set the customer’s APR. 

Under this program the dealer is capped at 200 basis point markup. That is likely the standard markup. Any deal that deviates from the standard markup must have a documented reason for coming off the standard markup. There are seven possible reasons for a deviation from the standard markup. Compliance is documented on every retail deal sourced to NMAC via yet another form titled Dealer Participation Certification Form.

This form gathers the deal identifiers (customer name, VIN, date, and assignee), the standard markup percentage, the specific transaction markup, the reason for the deviation from the standard markup, and requires two signatures. 

While I cannot speak to the specifics of what NMAC would audit for on this form in the event it decides to audit your portfolio, I can say we conduct compliance audits at some dealers who voluntarily implemented the NADA Fair Credit program. Here are a few of the documentation issues to be aware of. 

The form was not completed or is not in file. This is problematic because the intent of the program is to document the reasons for the deviation while the deal is still fresh in the minds of the managers who participated in the deal. Completing the form weeks later or when the dealer is notified of an impending audit can lead to false reporting of the reasons for the deviations from the standard markup.

A different finding in our audits is that the form was in the file but was not properly completed. One typical completion error include misstating the dealer's standard markup or the dealer reserve spread on the deal. Sometimes the manager will use the deal’s buy rate instead of the standard markup or list the final APR on the deal instead of the dealer reserve spread.

Another issue is that the reason for the deviation from standard markup was not checked or checked the wrong reason. Of the seven reasons provided on the form, the first one is ‘Dealer Participation limited by finance source.’ Too often that is the default reason on every deal, even though the finance source did not limit the dealer spread. The reason to check a valid reason to deviate from standard is to help build a case that the dealer deviated for non-discriminatory reasons. Checking the same box every time defeats that argument.

Continued Good Health, Good Luck, and Good Selling.

Subscribe to Our Newsletter
No form configuration provided. Please set either Form ID or Form Script.

More Blogposts

ACE Spacefrom Gil Van OverDecember 29, 2022

Desking in a Rising Rate Environment

If a dealership is still buying Sharpies to complete paper Four Squares, you will probably find a higher percentage of packed payments or potentially discriminatory pricing.

Read More →
ACE Spacefrom Penelope BellAugust 9, 2022

What is a Compliance Management System?

A CMS is the method by which a dealer manages the entire compliance process, including not only a compliance program, but also an audit function.

Read More →
ACE Spacefrom Gil Van OverDecember 21, 2021

Why Implement a Compliance Checklist?

The effective and consistent use of a checklist improves the deal, improves your CITs and will help with your compliance controls.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ACE Spaceby Gil Van OverOctober 7, 2021

Manage the Red Flags Process, Not the Report

A dealership sold and financed a vehicle to an identity thief, even after seven red flags were identified. Truly managing the process means vetting and clearing any red flags before delivering the vehicle.

Read More →
ACE Spacefrom James S. GantherSeptember 23, 2021

How to Charge More Than MSRP Without Getting Sued

You may sell a vehicle for more than the MSRP, but just be sure you do it right.

Read More →
ACE Spacefrom Penelope BellSeptember 2, 2021

The 5 Key Credit Determinants

There are five key credit determinants that lending institutions take into consideration when making the decision to extend credit.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ACE Spacefrom Gil Van OverJuly 29, 2021

Can I Charge for a CPO?

All four of our currently available data points suggest that a dealer cannot charge a consumer for a CPO warranty at the point of sale.

Read More →
ACE Spacefrom Penelope Bell June 22, 2021

Credit Application 101

A compliant credit application process is a pivotal part of the job. Do not let the process slip or a dealership could find themselves in some deep water.

Read More →
ACE Spacefrom Penelope BellMay 18, 2021

Out of Dealership Delivery

We all know identity theft is running rampant across the nation, making it even more important for dealers to do their due diligence when it comes to the digital delivery process.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ACE Spaceby Gil Van OverApril 6, 2021

Compliance Is Not a Program Du Jour

If you do not have a CMS and continuous monitoring in place now, today is a good day to start.

Read More →