MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Two Las Vegas Dealers Settle FTC Charges

Two auto dealers in Las Vegas agreed to settle FTC charges that they used deceptive ads to promote the sale or leasing of their vehicles, including advertising heavily discounted prices that were not generally available to consumers.

by Staff
June 30, 2015
2 min to read


WASHINGTON — Two auto dealers in Las Vegas agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission (FTC) charges they used deceptive ads to promote the sale or leasing of their vehicles, including advertising heavily discounted prices that were not generally available to consumers.

According to the complaints, TC Dealership, L.P., doing business as Planet Hyundai; and JS Autoworld, Inc., doing business as Planet Nissan; violated the FTC Act by running ads that misrepresented the purchase price or leasing offers of their vehicles and the amount due at signing. Their ads also violated the Consumer Leasing Act (CLA) and the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) by failing to disclose required lease terms and other credit information.

For example, in promotions by Planet Hyundai, the FTC charged that the dealership misled consumers by prominently advertising a vehicle price for “$0 down available,” and then in fine print noted that consumers must turn in a vehicle with a trade-in value of at least $2,500. The dealership also failed to disclose other information in its ads such as whether or not a security deposit was required.

Planet Nissan produced deceptive ads with prominent offers for “Purchase! Not a lease!” when in fact, many of the offers were for leases. Ads by the dealership also failed to disclose the amount of a down payment required, and the terms of repayment.

As part of the proposed consent orders, the dealerships are prohibited from misrepresenting the cost to purchase or lease a vehicle and are required to comply with CLA and Regulation M and TILA and Regulation Z.

These cases are part of the FTC’s continuing efforts to protect consumers in the auto marketplace, such as Operation Ruse Control and Operation Steer Clear. The regulator voted 5-0 to issue the administrative complaints and accept the proposed consent orders. The agreements are subject to public comment for 30 days, beginning June 29 and continuing through July 29, 2015, after which the FTC will decide whether to make the proposed consent orders final.

More Auto Finance

A hand holding small burlap money bags next to a toy red car, symbolizing auto financing, loan payments, and dealership profitability.
Auto Financeby StaffNovember 14, 2025

Report Uncovers $4.7B Opportunity for Auto Dealers

Solving mismatched payment quotes can boost sales, profits

Read More →
Industryby Hannah MitchellNovember 10, 2025

Auto Loans More in Reach

October easier to tap despite approval rates falling

Read More →
Industryby Hannah MitchellNovember 3, 2025

Q3 Auto Loans Reveal Stress

Data reflect growing finance activity on the extreme ends of credit risk scale

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Industryby Hannah MitchellOctober 15, 2025

Debt-Strapped Auto Consumers on the Rise

The amounts owed on under-water trade-ins reach new highs.

Read More →
F&Iby Hannah MitchellOctober 10, 2025

Helping the Credit-Crunched

Though many auto consumers are finding it challenging to trade, dealers can leverage conditions to help them get over the hump.

Read More →
IndustryJuly 31, 2025

Auto Borrower Divide Deepens

Recent patterns show good credit helps navigate high interest rates as highly leveraged consumers sink further.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Industryby Hannah MitchellJuly 10, 2025

Auto Credit Easier to Get

June upticks still came with risky exposures.

Read More →
Industryby StaffJune 12, 2025

Auto Loans a Little Easier to Get

Slight May improvement came with risks to borrowers, lenders.

Read More →
F&Iby StaffJune 5, 2025

Auto Loan Delinquencies Fell in Q1

Experian report shows other shifts, including banks clawing back market share.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Auto Financeby StaffMay 13, 2025

Auto Credit Picture Muddled

Overall April conditions didn’t benefit the consumer, especially those presenting more risk.

Read More →