MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

Pew: CFPB Small-Dollar Rule ‘Would Not Adequately Protect Borrowers’

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s small-dollar lending rule would neither adequately protect borrowers, nor address the risks created by the shift toward installment credit in the payday and auto title lending market, an analysis by Pew Charitable Trusts concludes.

by Staff
August 16, 2016
3 min to read


WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s proposed small-dollar lending rule would neither not adequately protect borrowers, nor address the risks created by the shift toward installment credit in the payday and auto title lending market, a new analysis concludes.

Conducted by Pew Charitable Trusts, the analysis outlines the reasons for the shift to installment lending, highlights the riskiest practices, and identifies actions the bureau can other policymakers can take to counter these harms. It also identifies four primary loan characteristics that harm consumers, including unaffordable payments, front-loaded fees, excessive durations, and unnecessary high prices.

“The CFPB proposed rule would require most small loans to be repayable in installments, which would represent a significant improvement, but that change alone is not enough to make these loans safe,” the nonprofit organization stated. “In 13 of the 39 states where they operate, payday and auto title lenders issue only high-cost, single-payment loans, but in the other 26, they are already making installment loans with annual percentage rates of 200% to 600%.

“These high-cost installment loans would still be permitted under the CFPB standards.”

The analysis identified four primary loan characteristics that harm consumers. They include unaffordable payments, front-loaded fees, excessive durations, and unnecessary high prices.

Pew’s brief, “From Payday to Small Installment Loans: Risks, Opportunities, and Policy Proposals for Successful Markets,” shows that unaffordable payments can lead to the same types of problems as convention payday loans, including frequent re-borrowing, heave use of overdrafts, and the need for a cash infusion to retire debt — issues the CFPB hoped to address when it proposed its rule this past June.

The brief also shows that large upfront origination fees “effectively penalize borrowers who repay early or refinance, while unreasonably long durations can double or triple borrowers’ costs.”

“Because payday and auto title lenders typically compete on location, customer service, and speed rather than on price, costs for these products, like conventional payday and auto title loans, are unnecessarily high, such as more than $1,000 in fees for a $500 loan,” the brief states, in part.

The brief also lists the following policy recommendations it says will address the four main challenges posed by installment loans:

  • Establish clear ability-to-repay standards, limiting loan payment to an affordable percentage of a borrower’s periodic income.

  • Allow only interest charges or monthly fees on the loan, and no other fees.

  • Require loan to have reasonable repayment durations.

  • Enact price limit and enable lower-cost providers, including banks and credit unions, to enter the small-dollar loan market.

“The payday loan market is rapidly shifting away from lump-sum lending toward installments, but 400% APR payday installment loans can be harmful, too,” said Nick Bourke, who directs Pew’s small-dollar loans project. “To protect consumers, the CFPB should add to clear product safety standards to its rule, such as limiting installment payments to 5% of a borrower’s paycheck. This safeguard would make exiting loans more affordable and enable banks to offer comparable small credit at prices six times lower than payday lenders, saving millions of borrowers billions of dollars annually.”

The CFPB’s notice of proposed rulemaking for small-dollar loans is open for public comment until Oct. 7. For more on the bureau’s proposal, click here.

More F&I

F&IJanuary 7, 2026

Resistance to the Menu

In this video, Reese Dailey of the Automotive Training Academy by Assurant explains how to handle a customer who isn’t willing to listen to your pitch.

Read More →
two-vehicle rear-end collision
F&Iby Lauren LawrenceJanuary 7, 2026

EV Collision Claims Spike

Third-quarter battery electric vehicle insurance claims were up 4% year-over-year. A new report says EV claims cost the most due to complex technology and limited after-market parts supply.

Read More →
TrainingDecember 10, 2025

Accountable Is as Accountable Does

Auto dealerships work better when all staffers own their duties.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
F&Iby StaffDecember 8, 2025

Remove the Warranty

Learn how you can show your F&I customers the unmistakable value of your offering.

Read More →
F&IDecember 3, 2025

The No. 1 Enemy of F&I Success

Instead of succumbing to it, keep your skills and knowledge sharp.

Read More →
F&Iby StaffNovember 17, 2025

F&I in the Gap

The office’s offerings can make the difference for cash-strapped consumers in an unpredictable market.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
F&INovember 10, 2025

Singing a Gospel Song Backward

Crime and punishment in auto retail and how to avoid them

Read More →
F&INovember 5, 2025

One Bad Day

Trent White of the Automotive Training Academy by Assurant explains how to help customers see the high cost risk with even the most reliable vehicles.

Read More →
Industryby Hannah MitchellNovember 3, 2025

Q3 Auto Loans Reveal Stress

Data reflect growing finance activity on the extreme ends of credit risk scale

Read More →
Ad Loading...
F&Iby Hannah MitchellOctober 29, 2025

The It Factor in F&I

What this valuable trait looks like in the day-to-day work of the sector

Read More →