MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

NADA Urges Dealers to Oppose Recall Amendment

An amendment rejected by the Senate Commerce Committee last week that would have barred dealers from selling recalled vehicles could be attached to a multi-year highway funding bill, the NADA warns.

by Staff
July 23, 2015
2 min to read


WASHINGTON, D.C. —After the Senate Commerce Committee struck down an amendment last week that would ban dealers from selling or leasing vehicles with open recalls, the proposal’s author promised to continue his fight as the Senate considers a multi-year highway funding bill.

Sen. Richard Blumenthal's (D-Conn.) amendment to the Comprehensive Transportation and Consumer Protection Act of 2015 was struck down on July 15 by the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation in a by an 11-13 vote. The amendment would prevent dealers from selling or leasing cars until any defect was remedied.

According to the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), Blumenthal hopes to attach his amendment to H.R. 22, the Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy (DRIVE) Act. The act would authorize $317 billion over six years for core highway and transit programs.

“The ‘Blumenthal amendment’ is flawed because it would give consumers less options when buying or trading in a vehicle,” the NADA said in a statement posted to its website. “Additionally, by devaluing trade-ins and not similarly regulating private sales, frustrated vehicle owners will resort to selling their vehicles in the private market, where the consumer has almost no safety or consumer protections, making it even less likely the vehicles will get fixed.”

The amendment does not actually require dealers to fix the recalled vehicles, according the NADA. Instead, it would effectively ground used cars with only minor compliance issues such as a misprinted phone numbers in the owner’s manual.

“Grounding vehicles with open recalls will not lead to faster repairs,” the NADA said. “The best way to strengthen consumer protections is to ensure that the most pressing safety recall issues are fixed in a timely manner.”

More Compliance

ComplianceNovember 26, 2025

Turnover and Compliance

Why ongoing training is a necessity

Read More →
F&INovember 10, 2025

Singing a Gospel Song Backward

Crime and punishment in auto retail and how to avoid them

Read More →
ComplianceSeptember 26, 2025

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems

Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceSeptember 15, 2025

Fines of the Times

Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 26, 2025

Goodwill and Car Dealers

A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 11, 2025

Your Synthetic ID Theft Policy

Frankenstein’s monster is coming for your dealership. Use this guide to recognize synthetic ID thieves and maintain Red Flags Rule compliance.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceJune 30, 2025

The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back

President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law

Read More →
IndustryJune 26, 2025

How to Clear a Red Flag

Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.

Read More →
Computer screen showing the Audit F&I Review Dashboard, displaying dealership selection and manager scorecard options for ABC Dealership.
F&Iby Press ReleaseJune 18, 2025

Mosaic Adds Continuous Monitoring With AuditF&I

New AuditF&I platform is designed to give dealerships a smarter way to stay compliant.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
IndustryMay 28, 2025

Mount Rushmore and Tariffs

A return to autarky? Are tariffs good policy?

Read More →