MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

NADA Chairman: ‘CFPB Guidance Lacks Transparency and Research’

The 2013 chairman calls out the CFPB for not demonstrating that problems exist with dealer participation programs, and questions the bureau’s use of the disparate impact theory.

by Staff
May 30, 2013
2 min to read


MCLEAN, Va. — Chairman David Westcott took to the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA)’s website in May to call out the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) for its lack of transparency in its quest to regulate dealer participation programs.

Westcott criticized the CFPB for releasing its fair lending guidance regarding dealer participation without demonstrating that problems exist and without analyzing the effects of any changes it makes to that compensation method.

“When a federal agency seeks to upend an enormously efficient $783 billion market, it should only do so in a manner that is transparent, thoroughly researched, and that benefits the interagency coordination and public feedback,” he wrote.

The chairman also called out the CFPB for centering its guidance on a theory of liability called “disparate impact.” Under that theory, if an auto finance policy results in a certain group of consumers paying more for credit than similarly-situated consumers in other groups, then unintentional discrimination is taking place.

“The bureau claims that this theory exists under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Regulation B and is using it to target the compensation arrangements used by indirect auto lenders with dealers,” he wrote. “The bureau favors arrangements in which indirect lenders compensate dealers through the use of flat fees instead of arrangements that allow dealers to discount the credit rates that they offer to consumers in order to earn their business.”

The chairman’s post also questions the CFPB’s lack of oversight and for not coordinating its enforcement actions with other regulatory agencies like the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Reserve Board. To read Westcott’s letter, click here.

The chairman’s comments echoed what F&I and Showroom’s Gregory Arroyo wrote in the magazine’s April 2013 issue. To read his editorial, click here.

More Compliance

ComplianceNovember 26, 2025

Turnover and Compliance

Why ongoing training is a necessity

Read More →
F&INovember 10, 2025

Singing a Gospel Song Backward

Crime and punishment in auto retail and how to avoid them

Read More →
ComplianceSeptember 26, 2025

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems

Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceSeptember 15, 2025

Fines of the Times

Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 26, 2025

Goodwill and Car Dealers

A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 11, 2025

Your Synthetic ID Theft Policy

Frankenstein’s monster is coming for your dealership. Use this guide to recognize synthetic ID thieves and maintain Red Flags Rule compliance.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceJune 30, 2025

The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back

President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law

Read More →
IndustryJune 26, 2025

How to Clear a Red Flag

Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.

Read More →
Computer screen showing the Audit F&I Review Dashboard, displaying dealership selection and manager scorecard options for ABC Dealership.
F&Iby Press ReleaseJune 18, 2025

Mosaic Adds Continuous Monitoring With AuditF&I

New AuditF&I platform is designed to give dealerships a smarter way to stay compliant.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
IndustryMay 28, 2025

Mount Rushmore and Tariffs

A return to autarky? Are tariffs good policy?

Read More →