MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

House Committee Votes to Repeal CFPB Auto Lending Guidance

The House Financial Services Committee passed a bill this week that would bring more transparency to the CFPB’s guidance-making process. If approved by Congress, it would effectively repeal the bulletin the bureau issued last year on indirect auto lending.

by Staff
June 12, 2014
2 min to read


WASHINGTON, D.C. — A bill supporters believe will bring more transparency into the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s guidance-making process was passed by the House Financial Services Committee on Tuesday.  

The bill, H.R. 4811, adds safeguards such as requiring prior public notice and greater transparency of future CFPB guidance. In addition, the bill would rescind a bulletin the bureau issued in March 2013. It stated that auto finance sources would be held responsible for discriminatory pricing resulting from policies that permit dealers to mark up interest rates as compensation for services rendered. The CFPB would be allowed to reissue the guidance, but with transparency and public review.

The Guidance Transparency Act bill passed the committee on a bipartisan 35-to-24 vote, with Democrats Joyce Beatty (Ohio), Steven Horsford (Nev.) and David Scott (Ga.) supporting the bill. It now heads to the full House of Representatives for a vote.

The bill will now be voted on by the full House of Representatives.   

Associations such as the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) have been vocal in support of the bill. On June 10, the NADA and the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, the American International Automobile Dealers Association (AIADA), American Financial Services Association (AFSA), Recreation Vehicle Industry Association (RVIA), and the Recreation Vehicle Dealers Association (RVDA) sent a letter to the committee in support of the bill.

“The auto finance guidance pressures indirect auto finance companies (lenders who finance auto loans originated by dealers) to eliminate the ability of dealerships to discount the interest rates offered to customers who finance their auto purchase,” the letter read, in part. “The bureau embarked on this new policy, by its own subsequent admission to Congress, without first studying what impact these policy changes would have on the auto finance market, or the marginally creditworthy.”

More Compliance

ComplianceNovember 26, 2025

Turnover and Compliance

Why ongoing training is a necessity

Read More →
F&INovember 10, 2025

Singing a Gospel Song Backward

Crime and punishment in auto retail and how to avoid them

Read More →
ComplianceSeptember 26, 2025

The Best Thing a Dealer Can Do to Avoid Legal Problems

Citing the issue is a strategy borrowed from the legal field itself.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceSeptember 15, 2025

Fines of the Times

Civil penalties for noncompliance with federal auto retail and finance rules and regulations can add up quickly. Use this checklist to cover your bases.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 26, 2025

Goodwill and Car Dealers

A dealer goodwill tale is a cautionary tale worth paying attention to.

Read More →
ComplianceAugust 11, 2025

Your Synthetic ID Theft Policy

Frankenstein’s monster is coming for your dealership. Use this guide to recognize synthetic ID thieves and maintain Red Flags Rule compliance.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
ComplianceJune 30, 2025

The Regulatory Empire Is Striking Back

President Trump - entropist and corporate disruptor in consumer law

Read More →
IndustryJune 26, 2025

How to Clear a Red Flag

Refine and enforce your dealership’s FTC-mandated ID theft-prevention program to ensure no transaction goes awry.

Read More →
Computer screen showing the Audit F&I Review Dashboard, displaying dealership selection and manager scorecard options for ABC Dealership.
F&Iby Press ReleaseJune 18, 2025

Mosaic Adds Continuous Monitoring With AuditF&I

New AuditF&I platform is designed to give dealerships a smarter way to stay compliant.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
IndustryMay 28, 2025

Mount Rushmore and Tariffs

A return to autarky? Are tariffs good policy?

Read More →