FI showroom red and grey logo
MenuMENU
SearchSEARCH

CFPB Fines SNAAC for Violating 2015 Consent Order

Security National Automotive Acceptance Co. agreed to pay $1.25 million to settle the bureau's charges that it failed to pay $2.275 million in consumer redress for illegal debt-collection tactics under the regulator's October 2015 order. But the company did so without admitting to the CFPB's finding, company officials said.

by Staff
April 26, 2017
CFPB Fines SNAAC for Violating 2015 Consent Order

 

4 min to read


WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) took action this week against Security National Automotive Acceptance Co. (SNAAC) for violating its October 2015 consent order, which ordered the auto finance source to pay both redress and a civil penalty for illegal debt-collection tactics.

According to the bureau's April 27 announcement, SNACC violated the 2015 order by failing to provide more than $1 million in refunds and credits to more than 1,000 consumers. Today’s consent order requires SNAAC to make good on the redress it owes and pay an additional $1.25 million penalty.

Ad Loading...

“The company violated a bureau order when it failed to get money back to servicemembers it has hounded with illegal debt-collection tactics,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “We are making sure this company finally rights its wrong.”

In an emailed statement to F&I and Showroom, SNAAC said the settlement resolves a disagreement between the finance company and the bureau over the intepretation of part of the 2015 order. "SNAAC agreed to this settlement to close the matter and move forward in serving customers in the respectful, honorable manner that has been the company's tradition," read the statement, in part. "The CFPB acknowledges in the settlement agreement that SNAAC has consented to the order 'without admitting" to its findings."

Based in Mason, Ohio, SNAAC operates in more than two dozen states and specializes in loans to servicemembers, primarily to buy used vehicles. In June 2015, the bureau sued the finance source for aggressive collection tactics against consumers. If servicemembers fell behind on payments, the bureau charged, SNAAC’s collectors would threaten to contact — and in many cases did — their chain of command about their debts. The bureau also said the company exaggerated the consequences of not paying, such as telling servicemembers that failure to pay could result in action under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, demotion, discharge, or loss of security clearance.

In October of that year, the CFPB issued a consent order against the finance source for engaging in unfair, deceptive, and abusive acts and practices while collecting on auto loans. The order required SNAAC to pay $2.275 million in consumer redress through credits and refunds and a $1 million civil penalty. Consumers with a balance with SNAAC were to receive account credits, while consumers with a zero balance were to receive cash refunds. SNAAC submitted two plans to meet its obligations under the consent order, but both plans, the bureau now charges, were designed to underpay the redress.

According to today’s announcement, the bureau, acting on a tip from a servicemember’s father, discovered that the finance source had issued “worthless credits to hundreds of consumers and failed to provide proper redress to many more.”

Ad Loading...

In today’s order, the CFPB claimed SNAAC issued credits on settled-in-full accounts, treating those accounts as having a positive account balance even though servicemembers could not use those credits toward any new or existing loan. It also charges the finance company with issuing credits to consumers whose debts had already been discharged in bankruptcy. It also alleges the company failed to properly give redress to consumers making payments under settlement agreements. In many instances, the bureau noted, SNAAC issued credits that exceeded consumers’ settlement balances rather than refund any amount above what the consumers actually owed. That resulted in some consumers unwittingly overpaying SNAAC to settle their accounts.

The CFPB has now ordered SNAAC to pay redress as promised to affected consumers, which amounts to about $720,000. It must also issue about $370,000 in new credits to more than 1,000 consumers with remaining account balances as well as properly credit about 1,000 consumers making payments under settlement agreements. The finance source must also pay $75,000 to the bureau to cover costs of distributing these payments.

The $1.25 million fine SNAAC must also pay to the CFPB Civil Penalty Fund is in addition to the $1 million penalty it paid under the 2015 consent order.

In its emailed statement, the finance company noted that the original consent order covered approximately 2,200 of the more than 83,000 accounts serviced by SNAAC between 2011 and 2015. It's issue with the bureau, the company said, was the application of credits provided to a fraction of those accounts that had already "benefited from a settlement balance for substantially less than was owed."

"Although SNAAC disagreed with the CFPB's interpretation of the 2015 consent order, the company offered to pay all the disputed amounts in order to move forward," the company said. "The CFPB declined the offer and began an inquiry. SNAAC fully cooperated and responded quickly to all requests for data, reports and testimony."


More F&I

Industryby StaffMarch 6, 2026

Explore the 12 Rules for an F&I Life at EFI

EFI 2026 will take place April 13–15 at The Cosmopolitan Las Vegas.

Read More →
F&IMarch 4, 2026

Creating Your Own Economy

In this video, Reese Dailey explains how effective follow-up drives better results across the dealership, including increased sales, higher F&I penetration, and stronger customer retention.

Read More →
Industryby StaffMarch 2, 2026

Prove You Can Do F&I at EFI

‘So You Think You Can Do F&I’ is a live role-play contest taking place at the 2026 Ethical F&I Managers Conference.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Industryby Lauren LawrenceFebruary 25, 2026

Report Finds Year-End F&I Strength

Deal volume ebbed and flowed throughout 2025, but product performance remained steady, according to automotive technology and data intelligence solutions provider StoneEagle.

Read More →
Industryby Hannah MitchellFebruary 23, 2026

Some Auto Brands Cheaper to Insure

A new top 10 list ranks the least expensive for average full insurance coverage on a clean driving record and high driver credit scores.

Read More →
F&IFebruary 13, 2026

Business Office Blueprint

Try following these 20 steps to greater success in the dealer F&I office this year.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Industryby Lauren LawrenceFebruary 11, 2026

Insurance Shopping on the Rise

A TransUnion study found that relationship-driven sales models proved to be important, as consumers who used an agent had a lower shopping intensity than those going it alone.

Read More →
Industryby Hannah MitchellFebruary 4, 2026

Auto Insurance Cost Reprieve

2025 brought consumers relief after years of rate hikes, but 2026 could bring renewed policy pain, depending on how U.S. trade policy affects prices.

Read More →
Reese Dailey from Automotive Training Academy by Assurant
F&IFebruary 4, 2026

Cash Deal Strategies

In this video, Reese Dailey of the Automotive Training Academy by Assurant reveals strategies to make cash deals profitable without relying on monthly payment bumps.

Read More →
Ad Loading...
Cox Automotive and Dealertrack logos displayed over a dealership showroom background.
F&Iby StaffFebruary 3, 2026

Cox Auto Says Dealertrack Offers Greater Finance Efficiency

Suite of new APIs, product enhancements and integrations is designed to help maximize contracting and funding efficiency for lenders and their dealer partners.

Read More →